I want to say
this morning that the Realm of God includes all parts of our lives,
and indeed the whole of creation. The Realm of God which Jesus came
to announce, promote and establish, and for which he was killed
pertains to every aspect of our lives: homes, gardens, fields,
schools, hospitals, government, prisons and all the places where we
play. This includes, then, our workplaces.1.
I first
learned this many years ago when I was a young man attending a
men's retreat. This gathering of men from many walks of life
(agriculture, business, industry, teaching and medicine) concluded
with us standing around the table of communion. Just before we were
invited to take the bread and wine, the minister looked around at us
and said: "I see here today many kinds of tables; the tables at
which you men work: desks, work benches, sales counters, examination
tables, kitchen tables and so on. Every walk of life has its own
table which is made sacred by this communion table."
The minister
paused for a moment, and then continued: "This communion table
around which we have gathered makes all those other tables into
sacred places. Just as Christ is present with us here through the
Bread and Wine, so also is Christ present at those other tables where
we go as the Body of Christ, and where we meet our neighbour."
I was an
airplane mechanic at the time, the truth of this profoundly affected
me, and my view of my place of work. I now saw my work bench as a
local for the Realm of God.
So, for me it
is very appropriate that we celebrate our work life in worship on
this Labour Day weekend. We are called to honour all workers, and all
workplaces, and to help ensure that all places of work are fair and safe.
We can take
this calling from the Hebrew prophets and from Jesus 2. For instance,
Jesus told a parable in which all workers got paid the same no matter
how how many hours they worked (Mt. 20:1-16). In this parable a
large group of farm workers showed up at the hiring hall ready to go
to work, but only a few got work. Later in the day some more were
hired. Finally just an hour before sunset the rest got jobs. At the
end of the day all got paid the same - even those who were unemployed
for most of the day, got a day's pay! (Very similar to today's
unemployment insurance). In hearing this parable we must remember
that a full day's pay in that society was barely enough to live on.
I think this
parable has two lessons in it. One is that this is how God dispenses
grace. We get a full measure of grace if have been faithful all our
lives, or if we give our hearts to God late in life. The second
lesson I see in this parable is this: We are to practise this same
generosity and even handedness in all aspects of society.
As we think of
applying this in the workplace today, two of the major issues that
face us are workplace honesty and workplace safety. In the time left
to me I want to speak about workplace safety.
Recently, the
Winnipeg Free Press featured a mother who was pressing for workplace
safety after her teenaged son was killed in an industrial accident on
his first summer job. She was saying that when parents trust their
children to a an employer, they do so in the expectation that that
employer will provide a safe environment for these children.
This is
clearly what is expected when we see the workplace as a portion f the
Realm of God, where children are central.
But not only
children. In 1982 my cousin Bill Jupp worked as an ambulance
attendant in an industrial zone. In this capacity, he cared for many
people who were badly hurt on the job. One day he was called to a
workplace accident to find that a worker had been killed on the job.
The other workers were stunned, and unable to resume their duties.
Bill himself was deeply affected. However, when the manager of that
workplace was told of the death he said: "Well, we are still OK.
When we planned this project, we allowed for four worker deaths, and
this is just the first."
When Bill
heard this, he decided to get out of the ambulance business and take
up a career in workplace Health and Safety. He said he wanted to stop
picking up the broken bodies, and see if he help make the work
environment one of safety, instead of danger.
Bill is a
practising Christian, and his decision to work for the well-being of
workers put him in line with the the biblical prophets when they call
for justice, and when the evangelists tell us that we each are
precious in the eye of God, and call us to "Love your neighbour
as yourself."
This is true
not only from a Christian perspective. The Charter of the United
Nations upholds these values found in both our holy scriptures, and
in the teachings of all the world's religions. The Charter asserts
the "inherent dignity of all members of the human
family." This dignity is expressed in the workplace by the
assertion that all workers have a right to "just and favourable
conditions of work."
So, as we go
into the world and return to our workplaces (including the home, and
volunteer workplaces), let us go in the. knowledge that Christ is
with us in that place as a part of the Realm of God. May we know
there God's peace in our soul, and in workplace safety and respect
for ourselves and our neighbours.
Jesus' way to deal with
conflict in congregations ecclesicakes A006
Yr. A Pent. 15 Matthew
18:15-20; Romans 13:8-14
This morning's Gospel lesson
probably speaks to most of us. It is about conflict in thechurch,
which at some time will touch many of us. This morning's Gospel
lesson is about how to act when we find ourselves in conflict. St
Paul also speaks to this. He says that Christians operate out of a
basic attitude of love toward one another, just as God loved us in Christ.
There is a story of a
congregation which, like many congregations, went through a period of
conflict. In the midst of this conflict the chair of the church board
received three anonymous messages. The first was a letter in the
mail. It read simply: "You have hurt me." The second was a
fax message. It gave bad news: " Everyone in the church dislikes
what you are doing." The third message was an e-mail farewell.
It read: "I am leaving the church." All these letters
were anonymous.
In this mornings Gospel
lesson, Matthew tells us that Jesus shows a better way than sending
an anonymous message. This better way is to go and speak face to
face. Go first alone, and if you don't get a satisfactory hearing,
take some one with you and go again. Only as a last resort do you
walk away.
In other words, Matthew gives
us a process to follow: First, speak directly and privately to the
appropriate person. Then, if that doesn't give you satisfaction, go
to them again with someone else from the church. This process allows
for two possible outcomes: reconciliation, or break up. I think the
important thing here for us to hear is - don't see leaving as your
first move.
I have known this process to
be used by a congregational member who was hurt by the minister.
One Sunday the minister scolded the congregation because none of its
members came to a community worship service held in the church
building. The minister complained with great passion: "People
from all around the city gathered right here to worship and seek
God's peace for the world, and I was the only one present from this
congregation. None of you came!"
Well, the week after that
outburst, a member of the congregation came to the minister, and
complained that she had been on a public peace walk that followed the
service, but couldn't make it to both the peace walk and the peace
worship. Mostly she came to let the minister know that she had been
hurt and offended by the minister's scolding. So the two of them
talked about this and the minister apologized, and she forgave me.
Then, the minister asked her
to hear how frustrating, and hurtful it was to have no one from this
congregation come to this"wonderful interfaith service"
which is held here every year in our own building. She said, yes, she
could understand that.
Now, that seems to me to be a
good example of using the method Jesus offers, and an example of what
Paul spoke of; God's love working through hurt and frustration. There
have been other examples of that in this congregation.
Sometimes this happens
through committees. For instance, one of you may have spoken to a
member of the worship committee about something you found not helpful
in worship. In this case, the worship committee will explore what
could be done to make worship more meaningful for that person and for
all of us. It is often helpful if a complaint is brought with an
example of what would make the situation better. For intsance,
"Some of were thinking that we would like the Passing of the
Pease at the very beginning of the service."
Sometimes, though there have
been opposing needs - for instance, in the matter of hymns. Some find
that the good old hymns meets all their needs, and they have no
patience with ones that are newly composed. Others say that many of
the older hymns use language that does not express their faith, while
the new hymns are very meaningful. So, the worship planners ask
people to be open to the needs of other worshipers.
On other occasions the
conflict requires something more. Some times we have to take
the second step, and ask someone to come in and help us deal with our
differences. In our denomination this can mean bringing in the
Presbytery to help a congregation resolve a serious matter. When the
situation has become this serious, it requires that everyone work
very hard to find common ground, and reconciliation.
These are examples of
handling conflict as Jesus taught. Again, this is an example of using
Paul's injunction that we love one another.
This is a central aspect of
the Realm of God, which Jesus announced. The Realm of God begins in
faith communities where reconciliation is as natural as the air we
breath, and where repentance and forgiveness are our spiritual food
and drink, and where the gate of grace is always open. This is what
the church will be like when it puts on Christ. We do find this in
the church.
But there is another side, a
dark side. For instance, I have see this method abused. Someone may
speak to the minister or a Board member about something they don't
like, and demand it be their way, or they will leave. This is an
abuse of Jesus' way. It is not good to make decisions in response to
threats. This cannot lead to reconciliation or peace. On the other
hand, there are times when the minister or board member simply
refuses to listen openly.
Or again this system can be
abused by hearsay. A person may come to a meeting and say: "I've
talked with important members of the congregation, and they don't
like what we are doing!"
That too can be unhelpful
because it is one person's interpretation of what others are saying.
Its what they refer to in the courts as hearsay. It is not good to
make decisions on hearsay. Hearsay pronouncements, do however, tell
us that at least the reporter is unhappy. This we can ask about and
seek to respond to.
As for everyone else, Jesus
suggests that people speak for themselves directly.
However, we all know that it
can be difficult to speak up for yourself. In order for this to
happen, it is required that there be an open atmosphere in a
congregation. There needs to be a level of acceptance and trust such
that people feel comfortable in speaking for themselves, not having
to issue threats or have someone else speak for them in hear-say.
Sometimes people need support
in saying what they need to say. If a person is afraid to speak for
themselves about a hurt, then three people from the church could hear
them first, and then go with them to the person who needs to hear
their complaint. Love and grace can be channeled through clear ways
for dealing with criticisms and complaints.
Where Jesus' suggestion is
not followed, terrible things happen that tear a church apart from
inside. For instance, I have experienced people turn to gossip, and
back- biting rather than openly dealing with disagreements or hurts.
For example: One minister told me of a phone call from a person
outside the congregation asking, "Do you know so and so?"
Minister: "Yes, I know that person, they are active in our
church." Caller: "Well, they have told me that they hate
you. Here is what they said.
The minister was
flabbergasted that a person she sees regularly in Board meetings is
making phone calls like this to people outside the congregation. She
wondered with me what to do.
Another minister tells me
that a person they trust is phoning other members of the church
spreading gossip and lies, and undermining the life of the church.
Then, when they meet this person face to face, they smile at me and
are sweetness itself.
We also have people who have
been treated well by the members of the congregation, decide to leave
over a trivial matter, without ever speaking to the person concerned,
and telling the whole world their version of events.
Of course ministers may
contribute to tensions in the congregation by acting in high-handed
ways, and by not listening to people who do come to them
I think St Paul would say
that such things point to a spiritual problem in the church. Rather
than an environment of grace, peace and forgiveness, reconciliation,
where we work things through, the church becomes a place of judgment.
An environment of judgment makes for a false community in which
people become fearful of being judged.
In this environment, people
and ministers are afraid of being creative in ministry out fear that
if they get it wrong, they will be judged, gossiped about and
condemned. In fact, in an intense environment of judgment you will be
criticized no matter what you do, but open disagreement is frowned upon.
Since all this happens behind
people's backs, everything will be fine on the surface and the hurt
goes underground, and people will talk behind one another's backs, or
silently fume, or leave - with a parting shot of anger
Now, I don't want to say that
leaving isn't always the wrong choice. It can be very healthy for a
person to seek another church that better meets their needs. In such
a case it is good if such persons find a way to leave with love and
grace. For instance, one might say to the congregation they are
leaving: Thank you for the years we have had together, It has been
good, and now I need to go to another church that meets my needs, or
is closer to where I live.
So, what to do? Jesus tells
us to use an open process where anyone who is hurt or angered can
come and get a hearing. St. Paul reminds us that love and grace are
to be the basis upon which we live together.
Finally, let us remember that
we are not seeking perfection. I find that both grace and judgment
live side by side in most congregations. I suspect that when we look
at ourselves, we find the same thing within us. At our best, we act
in grace, love and peace, and at our worst, we act in judgment, in
disdain, and condemnation.
So, we come to God in Christ
for the grace we each need, asking God forgiveness for our failure to
love, and then as grace-based people express love by talking plainly
and openly to one another, and by listening to one another's
complaints with patience, seeking reconciliation.
Holy Communion is an
essential part of the whole process. The gate of grace is open, and
we may come to the Holy meal, to be nourished by God's holy love,
which sets us free to live as members of God's Holy Realm.
P
17 . A
story-telling interpretation of Mathew 18:23-35,the parable of the
unforgiving servant
When Peter
asked Jesus how many times we are to forgive, he answered that we are
to forgive our sister or brother not seven times, but seventy times
seven. Then, he told a parable. Here is my "story-interpretation"
of that parable.
A man named
Jacob was badly in need of forgiveness for a debts he owed his
employer. He needed forgiveness that was far beyond reason. It was
ridiculous to imagine that that he could be forgiven.
Forgiveness of debt was not an option in cases such as his.
So Jacob
sought the best way open to him. He planned to plead for more time in
which to repay this enorous debt. Even this was a long shot. No
matter how much time he was allowed, it was impossible to see how he
ever could pay the huge debt he owed his master. However, he felt
compelled to try because the only other alternatives were the
confiscation of all his possessions, hard labour for the rest of his
life, and the ruination of his family. Himself and every thing and
every person attached to him was considered collateral to be taken in payment.
Jacob's hope
was that his long history of faithful service to the master would get
him a favourable hearing. He had worked in the master's household
since the age of twelve. His quick wits and ingratiating manner had
allowed him to rise quickly until he became the master's chief
grain-buyer. At age twenty he was a man with a wife and three
children and a modest house he leased from the master.
This success
gave him a taste for money, which he satisfied by buying and selling
grain on his own. Very early Jacob learned that in the grain trade,
money was made by buying at a low price, then holding the commodity
in bins until the price was high. This involved some risk, but Jacob
saw how the traders prospered. By making friends of the chief
accountant, he was able to borrow from the master's accounts and
repay his debts at the end of the year from under the table gratuity
he received from grain buyers and from his own modest trading in commodities.
All this was
legal as long as the master's profits didn't suffer, and as long as
Jacob paid his debts at the end of each tear. However, these last
three years the grain trade failed, and Jacob was not able to repay
his loans, which amounted to the great sum of two thousand Talents.
He had pleaded for time and was granted it twice. This year, in
desperation he borrowed eight thousand Talents and bought many bins
of grain, which again sold for less than he paid. Over these recent
years the master also lost money, and now was calling in all his
debts. He had a right to take even Jacob's own body in payment.
Jacob had seen
what happen to others who were caught in this predicament. A
colleague, who had unwisely gotten into debt beyond his means to pay,
had been sold into slavery to a highway contractor as partial payment
for his debt. As further payment, his three children were place into
indentured servitude for ten years and his wife became a prostitute.
To be indebted to a master was very dangerous, and must be paid.
The chief
steward told Jacob that the same fate awaited him, but the master was
willing to give him a hearing before selling him. So, afraid and
sweating, Jacob's silver tongue and ingratiating manner failed him as
he groveled and pleaded for one more chance.
Then, to
everyone's amazement, the master came down from his chair and lifted
Jacob to his feet. "My son," he said, "You will never
be able to repay such an enormous debt, so I will forgive it. Go back
to work, enjoy your children and be less greedy and foolish in the future."
Jacob left the
hearing hardly able to believe his good fortune. As he strode away,
his stride became confident and even a little cocky. He thought,
"surely this is a sign of how valuable I am to the Master."
The first
thing he did when he got back to his office was sign papers, which
threatened jail to every fellow servant who owed him money. He
said to himself, "Let them know how important a person it
is to whom they owe a debt!"
When the
master heard of this, he called Jacob back into his presence.
"Did you learn nothing of kindness from my forgiveness of you? I
treated you like a son, and swallowed the loss you caused to me.
Could you not let that kindness fill your heart so that you would
have mercy on your fellow servants, just as I have had mercy on you?"
Surely, you
must now pay your debts. Your wife and children I will not harm, but
you must pay with imprisonment and torture until all you debt is
paid. Perhaps those to whom you have been so unkind will ease your
pain by small payments on what they owe you."
Having
concluded this parable, Jesus said: "So also will this happen to
you if you do not forgive your brother or sister from your heart. You
cannot use God's grace as an opportunity for advantage and gain over
your neighbours."
"Story-interpretation"
is a way of interpreting a passage of scripture by way of story-telling.
Today's Gospel lesson is
about forgiveness, a central doctrine of Christianity. A most central
Christian teaching tells us that the chief work of Christ was to set
us free from our sins, and lead to a new life.
Forgiveness is key to
Christianity. St. John tells us that while the law of God comes to us
from Moses, God's grace comes to us through Jesus Christ (John 1).
St. Paul writes us that while we all have sinned, we are put right
with God by the free gift of grace through faith in Jesus Christ
(Rom. 3:21-26).
However, forgiveness raises
some questions.
For instance, In this past
week's Free Press there was a story of a young woman who was
sentenced to 8 years in prison for the death of her two children. On
the day on which she was sentenced, her parent's apologized for her
action, and asked that she be forgiven. Can a woman be forgiven for
the manslaughter of her children?
Last month a husband beat his
wife and children until the police came and arrested him. A few days
later he asked her to forgive him. Should she forgive him and Take
him back?
What if someone asks you to
forgive them, and then they just do what offended you all over again?
This morning in churches all
across this land, preachers are telling their congregations that if
they simply accept Jesus Christ, they will be forgiven all their
sins. Is this letting people off too easily?
In this morning's parable a
person is forgiven a great debt he owes his boss, then when the man
refuses to forgive those who are in debt to him, the forgiveness is
revoked, and he is thrown into debtor's prison.
My way of sorting out all
this is to see that there is a certain protocol to forgiveness. That
is, forgiveness has a pattern that we must work through to make it
work. In this pattern there are benefits and expectations, and even
dangers, for both the one who forgives, and the one who is forgiven.
Lets look first at the
dangers in forgiveness. Samuel Clemens pointed out one of the major
ones. The author of Tom Sawyer, was asked about the place of religion
in his life, and he replied: "God and I get along very well. I
love to sin and God loves to forgive. "
This points a false
acceptance of forgiveness; take the forgiveness and keep on doing hurt.
We might do like the person
in Jesus' parable; we take the grace and think it means that we must
be too important to not forgive, and we feel free to not change. He
refuses to forgive those who have a debt to him.
We might think: If my friend
or spouse forgives me, it is because I am great. Great people like me
don't need to change. I will act as I please and they will surely
forgive me again because they need me.
This will bring harm to
everyone involved. The forgiven wife beater accepts the forgiveness
and six months later hits her again. The abusive mother does her time
in jail and comes out the same person.
So, even as we forgive, we
need to ask for assurances that there will be change. The change
needs to be clearly named, and steps toward change spelled out. It is
often helpful if we can participate in helping the offender change.
If change does not seem likely then we need to decide how we care for ourselves.
When we are the one
forgiven, we must ask for help in changing. Otherwise the destructive
Samuel Clemens pattern of sin and forgiveness, sin and forgiveness
gets repeated over and over.
So far I have spoken of all
this as mainly between us an other people, but it is also true of us
and our relationship with our creator. Every Sunday we come to church
and seek God's grace. We accept it, but we may not let it change us.
Instead of taking this grace which God so freely gives as an
opportunity to become more and more a person of God, we may go out
the church door, and not be generous to us neighbour.
These are some of the dangers
in practicing forgiveness. Let us turn now to consider the benefits
of forgiving.
Samuel Clemens was right when
he said God loves to forgive. Our Creator is does not want to go
about angry and threatening all the time - no, our creator chooses to
be in a loving supportive relationship with us. So, our creator loves
to forgive us. Samuel Clemens was right in this regard God does love
to forgive, God loves to forgive me and you.
As children of God, we are
called on to enjoy forgiving also. Do you want to go about angry and
resentful toward someone all the time? I am sorry for you if you
enjoy being sour when happiness is found in being kind,
compassionate, loving and forgiving. It is good for us in mind, body
and soul to forgive - to let go of the resentment, bitterness, and
anger which eats away inside us.
An abused woman once said to
me I have to let go of the anger, and resentment, so that I can go on
with my life. To forgive is to let go.
To forgive is also to grow
our souls, and to bring godliness within us and our living.
These are some of the
benefits of forgiving. You may be able to name other benefits from
your own experience.
Now what about the benefits
of being forgiven. The main benefit is the freedom to start anew - to
not have to carry around the guilt and shame of the hurt you have
done, or of the good you refused to do.
The person in Jesus' parable
was given an opportunity to start afresh. The forgiven wife beater is
given a -chance to seek help and deal with the demons that are
driving him. The mother who neglected her children to death is able
to start now to get help and become well and whole. What is true in
these major instances of forgiveness, is true also of the lesser ones
we give and receive every day. This seems to me to be the first
benefit of receiving and accepting forgiveness.
The Christian who finds
themselves not caring about their neighbour, gets a new chance to
start changing that.
A second benefit is that
being forgiven gives us a wonderful opportunity to become forgiving.
Both these benefits lead us
to growth in our whole being. We become truly children of the loving
forgiving God.
With all these benefits it is
little wonder that Jesus bids us to forgive and forgive and forgive.
This implies, of course that we will also be forgiven, and forgiven,
and forgiven.
So, let us today accept fully
the rich grace which God lavishes upon us, and take it into out souls
so that we may, like a growing plant, blossom as God would have us do.
Thank God for the wondrous
grace God shows us, and leads us to show to our neighbours.
Being a Father (Trinity
Sunday Yr. B) <Father's Day>
Isaiah 6:1-8. Isaiah's vision
and call
Psalm 103 As a
Father&ldots;(in place of Ps. 29)
Romans 8:12-17. Live by the
Spirit, not by Human nature.
John 3: 1-17. We cannot see
the Realm of God unless we are born of the Spirit / God so loved the world..
Sermon notes:
Today is a special Sunday.
There are several ways to celebrate this day.
In the church calendar this
is Trinity Sunday, the first Sunday after Pentecost. It is the day
when we recognize that for Christians God is known as Trinity:
Father, Son and Holy Ghost or Creator, Redeemer and Holy Spirit.
We are probably more aware
that this is a special day in the secular Hallmark calendar too.
Of course, this is Father's Day.
Thirdly, in the natural,
calendar this is the last Sunday of Spring. So, this is the last
Sunday afternoon to get your garden in before Summer begins next Saturday.
Finally, it is a special day
in the athletic calendar. It is the day when the Manitoba Marathon is
run. They are running right now, and have been for several hours.
Maybe it is an even more
special day in your house? Birthday or anniversary?
Any one of these could be
used in today's sermon. For instance, St. Paul compared the Christian
life to running in a Marathon. So we could choose to use that
imagery this morning.
Or, we could look to the
natural calendar and celebrate God's gifts of the Spring and Summer.
What I have chosen to do is
focus on both Trinity Sunday and Father's Day. Some parts of this
morning's service recognize the Trinity, and this sermon will be
mostly about being a father. Much of what I have to say about being a
father will also apply to being a mother, aunt, uncle, or
grandparent, or friend of children.
What I have to say comes from
my own experience and reflection on the Gospel. I have lots of
experience in fathering. I am a father of four natural children, and
two stepchildren, and grandfather of seven grandchildren, and four
great grandchildren.
As I begin, let me say that I
realize that every family has to work out how they will live together
as a family under the God who loves us, in a world that does not
honour family or God. We want our children to grow up to be good and
true, and we want to love them and have them love us. It is not easy,
nor is there only one way.
I have found that being a
father and grandfather is a life-long learning experience. My
children and grand children teach me some thing pretty well every
day. Mostly they teach me what a wonderful thing it is to be a human
being in God's world. Right now Carole and I spend a lot of time with
two grandchildren. One is four and the other is one. You who have
small children in your life with know what I mean when I say:
Watching them grow in body, in mind, and in spirit causes me no end
of wonder over God's creation.
They also teach other central
messages of the faith which fathers need to know. My children and
grandchildren teach me about love. Partly they teach that love is
like a one of those other things that's happening today - love is
like a marathon - it is a long race and there is no stopping part way
through - even if on some days you may want to.
The love of a father is to be
like the love of God. John's gospel for today tells us that God sent
Jesus into the world, not to condemn the world, but to love the
world. Our children and grandchildren teach us that this is our role
too. Not to condemn, but to love. We will give guidance, and
correction, but that is not condemning.
As I look back over my
forty-eight years of fathering, I realize that I was always trying to
live out the commandment of Christ: Love one another. However, in the
beginning I didn't know how. These forty-eight years have been, and
continue to be a process of learning how to show love as a father. In
some key ways I am not the father I was when I began this journey.
In today's lesson from
Romans, St. Paul advises us to live not according to the values of
the world, but according to ways of the Spirit. I know that I began
by using the world's values.
When I first became a father,
I thought that the best thing that could be said of a father was that
he was a good provider, and disciplinarian. I had the impression that
it was not so important for a father to show affection to his
children, or make it a high priority to spend time with his children.
I believed that the highest priorities of fathering were providing
and spanking.
As my children became
teen-agers I stopped hugging them. In those days it was called the
generation gap. A friend of mine told me that his wife said there was
a gap growing between him and his children. He told her it didn't
matter - what mattered was that he be a good provider.
Then, about twenty years ago,
I became convinced that it was important to hug my sons and daughters
who were young adults by then. Now, we always greet one another with
a hug, and the words, "I love you." It seems to me that St.
Paul would call this is a more spiritual way.
I also know that for many
years I put my job ahead of my family when it came to giving time. I
am now convinced that during those years I was living according to
the world's values. It is very important to be a good provider, but
not at the cost of family. I also know how difficult it is for young
fathers to say to their boss, "I cannot be at work, I am
spending time with my family." I think this is even more true
today than when I was a young father. In many instances, the world
does not really value family.
In all my working years I
made several tries at giving my family the priority they deserved,
but is was always a struggle. I allowed the world to rule me. Even
though I was working for the church, I did it according to the world,
not by the Spirit.
It is only now in retirement
that I find myself trying to make up for it. It is a lot easier in
retirement, but I do see some retired men who still keep the old
habits of putting family last. It is not easy to change a life time habit.
I like the men's prayer
from the Red Green Show: I am a man, and I can change - if I have to.
Then, there is one other way
that my values in parenting have changed. This too my children have
taught me. It has to do with spanking. I know that this is a touchy
issue, so I ask you to hear my experience, and after the service I
will be willing to hear yours.
I grew up in an age of
hitting. My father hit us very hard. Several times I was strapped by
the principle of my school for no good reason. When I was young
father I hit too. I know that I often spanked my children very hard.
Today I regret it. I wish I
could take it back.
In the households of
some young families, no one hits anyone. The mother and father of our
young friends not spank. Neither do most of their friends. I think
this is a better way.
In conclusion, let me say
again that I realize that every family has to work out how they will
live together as a family under the God who loves us, in a world that
does not honour family or God. We want our children to grow up to be
good and true, and we want to love them and have them love us. It is
not easy, nor is there only one way.
As for myself, I trust that I
will continue to be open to being taught by my children and grand
children, even as I have some wisdom and understanding to share with them.
May God continue to grant us
peace and love, in our families, in the church, and in the community.
Feel free to use this
material as a resource, kindly acknowledging ecclesicakes
In today's lesson s we
encounter three remarkable people of our faith tradition in
whom we may find something of ourselves. They are David,
Nathan, and Jesus. As they are presented to us in today's scripture
lessons, each represents one aspect of being a faithful person in society.
I am proposing this morning
that there is something of David, Nathan, Jesus in us, and that each
as presented in this morning's readings, has a word for us. So, As
you listen you may find something of yourself here, or you may
disagree and find something else in these biblical stories. I'd be
interested to hear your views.
First, David, the one we
least want to be like. David is presented as repentant sinner. For
today's sermon it is not important to identify David's sin. It is
enough to know that David's sin is a terrible abuse abuse of
his power, and he thinks at first that he got away with it.
However, the prophet, Nathan,
knows what David did and confronts the king with his sin. He tells
David that he is just like a rich man who stole a poor man's only
sheep. When David hears this he is stricken with guilt, and repents.
The David shown to us in this morning's lesson is a repentant abuser
of power, which he acknowledges to be a sin before God.
Is there anything of us in
this David? The misuse of power is common in our society. It seems to
me that we can wrongly use our power in many everyday ways - at home,
at work, in church, or as a consumer.
Next, let us look at Nathan.
Nathan is a prophet spokesperson for God. He is the one who points
his finger at David, the King. He pushes David to see what he has
done and the consequences of his behaviour.
Is there anything of Nathan
is us? In our culture the media often take the role of pointing out
abuses of power by those in authority. Historically this has been
also the role of the church. We can also do this also as
private citizens. Often the disapproval of we the public shows up in
polls, letters to the editor, or e mails to government ministers.
Finally, we look at Jesus as
he is presented in this passage from John. Here we find Jesus being
cranky toward the people. The people are those whose hunger was
satisfied the day before in the feeding of the 5000. Now they have
come looking for the one who fed them.
We who regularly eat three
meals a day, and have access to a ready source of food at the
shopping centre, probably will have trouble appreciating the new
possibility these first century peasants see in Jesus as a food provider.
Jesus himself has been trying
to get away for a rest and restoration. When he sees this crowd
coming he is cranky with them and says: "I know that you are
here because you were well-fed yesterday, but don't you know I have
something other than perishable food to give you also?
I am sure that each of us has
felt like this at some time - unappreciated at home, at work, as
teachers, as child or youth, as spouse, as friend; feeling we are
wanted for something less than what we fully have to offer.
Could it be that there is
something of us that is comparable to these three figures as they are
presented to us i today's scripture lessons?
Is there some David the
sinner in us? The church seems to think so. There is a prayer of
confession in every order of service. I once heard one
worshipper say to another: "I never say those prayers of
confession. I am not a sinner!" Could it be that the prayer of
confession does not apply to us?
Then is there something of
Nathan in us? As a member of the clergy I see some of Nathan in me.
One role we all can share in as a church is that of speaking g
to our leaders as Nathan spoke to David; pointing out the places
where our society has exercised what seems to us to be an abuse of
power and naming the terrible consequences of that. For instance, how
is it that a rich country like ours has a growing number of poor
children who are not able to concentrate on their school work because
of poor nutrition?
Then what about the
crankiness toward people that we see in Jesus? Is there some of this
in us? Do you ever feel that you want to say, "Let's get real!
Let us go for the things that are eternal, and not be devoting all
our energy on those things that are passing away?"
Maybe you want to say that to
yourself. At a certain age we may reflect on how we have spent our
life and now want to take a new direction. I have certainly
experienced this in retirement. I know that in my work life I gave
far to much to my job, and too little to family.
Would you agree that the
qualities we see in these three figure (David, Nathan, and Jesus) are
also in us according to the traditions of our faith?
I would say: yes, they are!
1. Like David we, the church,
are a bunch of forgiven and repentant sinners. A central
characteristic of faithful persons is the ability to acknowledge
their participation in the hurt of the world through abuse of power,
and then to assert that through God's grace we can take steps to live
a new and life true to the Gospel. This is not to be taken lightly
and is not easy to do without the aid of the Holy Spirit.
2. Then. like Nathan, we are
called to help identify the sin that we, our church and our society
is involved in and to take action to correct it. We do this not to
become blaming and abusive ourselves, but to offer the grace of God
and to be ready to employ our power to sharing God's righteousness
and love.
3. Finally, like Jesus,
we too get frustrated with the world when we see how much time energy
and money is spent on that which is not of the Spirit. As a faithful
people this can be a creative unhappiness with the banal and wasteful.
There is power in being
faithful persons eeking to live a renewed life, pointing out the
abuse of society, and working for the food that lasts to eternal life.
As with all power there can
be abuse of this power too, so we must be careful how we act. For
instance, in recognizing our participation in the world's hurt, we
need to be carefull not to devalue ourselves or others. The opposite
of a person who sees no sin is one who sees no good in themselves or
their neighbour. We do sin, but we are also God's precious creation
and as such we are of great value.
In being like Nathan we need
to guard against being self-righteous. If we see a sin in society,
very likely we play a role in it. If the sin we see is in some
individual, we need to remember that is is our brother or sister
sinner, and that we too depend on God's grace. Each and every one of
us needs the love and support of the community.
In being impatient and cranky
as Jesus is shown to be in this passage, we need to to be careful to
listen to that person, especially if they have little power in the
world. It is so easy for us who have a relatively secure roof over
our head and food in our cupboard, to blame those who have not
Those friends of mine who
work in the church's ministries with the poor, and who, like Jesus,
get cranky, say that their ministries are built on the faith they see
in those who have been forced to the margins of society. They tell me
that those same "poor" have much to teach us.
Remember too that it was the
King, not the poor whom Nathan was criticizing. Jesus as well is most
often seen to be calling into question the role of those in
authority, while building kingdom of the faith of the llowly (seeLuke 6:20f).
So, I propose that these
three are essentials of the faithful life: (1. being like David, a
forgiven sinner; 2. being like Nathan, naming abuses of power;
3. Following Jesus in being cranky about lack of spiritual depth) .
May we exhibit these characteristics in our living as individuals and
as a community of Christ.